Friday, July 09, 2010

Quivering Daughters, Reading Notes Part II: Comparisons with the original "Quiverfull" movement--the pre-Vatican II Catholic Church

The giveaway of the BIG BOOK OF FREEZER COOKING is HERE [be sure to leave a NAME!!!]


As I am reading Hillary's deeply moving and emotional prose, I am reminded that the Bible tells us:
"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." (Ecc. 1:9)

Many of the people in this movement would likely be dismayed by this comparison, but Quiverfull is a "been there, done that, got the therapy" moment for many Roman Catholics. Until the Vatican II in the mid-1960s, Catholics were basically expected to live as the Quiverfull folks do--letting God open and close the wife's womb. Yes, the could use "natural family planning," but there is a reason people are said to "practice" the "rhythm method"--no one perfects it. Those of us who grew up before the pill was the norm [even into the early 70s] remember "that" family with "all those kids." Except possibly in Utah, that meant a Catholic family. A troop of kids with Saint's names--such as the 11 children of Senator Robert F. Kennedy [before his untimely death] gleamed their teeth and freckles at us from the pages of Life and Look magazines. Happy, healthy active--and just as deceptive as the Duggars and other such families today. Quiverfull families today might take a lesson from the trouble's Ethel Kennedy apparently had after her husband's murder. No amount of money, no matter how many uncles you have, death of a parent upsets the apple cart.

Sometimes, it takes less than that. Hillary movingly writes of one of the major downsides to the Quiverfull--ATI/IBLP-"Cult of Character" families: negative self-worth among the children and parents. Why? Legalism, authoritarianism, "cult of personality"[Daddy], idol worship [character, the role of the father], repression [the "keep sweet" mentality]. Even Jesus "frequently sought solitude" (p. 83)--something never granted in the large, authoritarian families prized by the far-right Christian patriarchal families of today. Closed doors or time alone are usually forbidden--they may lead to sin.

"An Authoritarian, performance-based family who trains through coercion--such as withholding love, affection, acceptance, or approval to manipulate behavior--creates an environment that can't help but keep household members at a heightened state of stress. A demanding or fear-based atmosphere requires constant adrenaline for survival mode, keeping one perpetually 'on edge' through fight-or-flight syndrome."


Another book, that seems to have missed the rounds of bloggers on big families, shows us what happens in a big family when all of the things big families should be become "too much" for the parents who created the family. That book is FOURTEEN, aptly subtitled "Growing Up Alone in a Crowd," by Stephen Zanichowsy.


Zanichowsy tells the story of growing up in a large Catholic family in which his Father would not allow his mother to ask even relatives for help with their ever-growing family. His mother, severely depressed by lack of control over any area of her life, is "unavailable" to her children in even the most basic ways. Father, contrary to today's Quiverfull teaching of family business, was a successful engineer who eventually even moved the family to another state. Food is a problem--the children have mostly boiled eggs to eat and relish the one day per week when their one egg is cooked the way they want it. Totally beyond their sick mother's control, the boys are locked in their bedroom at night to keep them corralled. Two of the children, are "afflicted" as their mother terms it, and finally are sent away. The trauma is made worse when they leave the "old neighborhood" where the parents grew up and move into a huge house in an affluent area. The kids develop neurosis and deviant behaviors in response to lack of any meaningful expressions of caring or love by their parents.

FOURTEEN, to me, is where Gothard and others got their idea of parents of huge families "working themselves out of a job" by placing the burden of raising these huge families onto the young shoulders of, especially, the eldest daughters. The idea of "training" to be a wife and mother [which is absurd] thus takes the burden of care off the parents, who are then reasonably "free" to enjoy only their marriage and creating more children. FOURTEEN also, sadly, shows me what will happen to many of these families. Coercion to conform, endless lectures on sin, etc, will have the desired effect--it will raise sin-obsessed children who hate religion. With a dominant, controlling figure [Daddy] at the head of the family, children will be endlessly competing for the crumbs of attention he is able to give. Mother, constantly focused on delivering the next blessing [and often too sick to be any use to the family] abdicates her responsibility to immature daughters who can't yet care fully for themselves. In short, a recipe for disaster.

For those who wonder, YES, at least one or two [can't remember exact numbers] of the children in the FOURTEEN family were arrested or had a host of other problems adjusting to society. One or two came out as gay or lesbian. Nor is the family, apparently, close now. Most of the kids, it appears, just plain fled to lick their wounds and heal. In the opening of the book, the author recounts that the mother's funeral was only the 2nd time in THIRTY years that all the surviving kids had been together. I wonder, how today's Quiverfull kids, raised in strict isolation with only siblings and MAYBE a few "approved" friends in carefully controlled, well-supervised, group settings, will turn out?

Although their is a Catholic "wing" of the Quiverfull movement, today Catholics have families of "normal" size---for a reason. Too many were raised by parents who did not get the necessary love and attention growing up.

Jim-Bob and Michelle, it's too late for you--the KID FARM video was right: You are only able to speak of your children as individuals in terms as vague as a fortune cookie's message. Josh and Anna--it's not too late for you. Give McKynzie a chance--have many fewer children than your parents did. Give her freedom to close her door and THINK. Let her make the decisions about her own future. If nothing else, read FOURTEEN.

For my first post on the book Quivering Daughters, click HERE.

For more information on the Quiverfull movement click HERE.

10 comments:

Hillary said...

Thank you for this, Lisa. I've sadly never heard of the book Fourteen but really want to read it!

Kelly said...

I think you're a little confused on the Catholicism part of this. Vatican II didn't change any of the church's teaching about birth control. It remains the same today, but most Catholics ignore it. But contrary to the QF movement, Catholic teaching allows for "natural methods" to be used to prevent pregnancy in order to space children, or for serious reasons which may be health, financial, depression, etc.

When rhythm was developed in the 50's it was as effective as the other most effective birth control at the time, the diaphram (spermicide had not yet been developed). Just as the Pill and other artificial methods have changed since the 1950's, so has rhythm. NFP, as it is now known, can be as effective as artificial methods. Just as condoms don't work if you leave them in the box, so is NFP rather unforgiving if you change your mind about abstaining during the fertile time.

I think that people look at families such as these and point the finger at the number of children. While an unhealthy marriage will be made worse by having a large number of children, that doesn't mean that if this couple had stopped with two that they wouldn't have had any problems.

My grandparents, a Catholic couple who had four children in the 1930s-1950s, spaced successfully through rhythm, had a terrible marriage and their children bore the brunt of it. But yes, it probably would have been worse if there were 14 instead of 4.

Pebblekeeper said...

I am friends with quite a few families of the quiver full thoughts. I have seen them have 6-7 children and then until the rafters are full.

I see from the side that moms become directors and the older children become the parents. By older, I mean those over the age of 8 or 9. I do love being with the large families - and some of the joyful times being with a huge group can bring -
but have not cherished the family dynamic of it all. I am sadded to see children at such young ages, without wisdom or maturity raising children - whom should be siblings and not servants. When I spoke up to say that I didn't want their children to "parent" mine when we were around - I was basically kicked out of the inner circle. I asked for their children not to discipline mine - but to come and see me if there is a problem. Its unheard of for mom to ever know the problems within the 2-3 families in this group.

I hope more of these kids speak their truth of their heart and experience.

Hopewell said...

THANK YOU Pebbleeeper for your comments! Keep speaking out about this, please!

Hopewell said...

THANK YOU Pebbleeeper for your comments! Keep speaking out about this, please!

Susan said...

14 sounds fascinating ... when watching the Duggars (they are the face of big families, to me) I'm always amazed at how all the kids seem to "toe the line." Heck, I haven't been able to accomplish that with my 3 - but maybe it's because I try to let them be themselves, whereas the Duggars seem to put a large emphasis on conformity within a very narrow Christian standard. I've often wished I could look at that family in 20 years and see how all the kids "turn out."

Hopewell said...

Susan--I think we're all dying to know how they turn out! Can't wait for the Mommy Dearest--Quiverfull Editions to start coming off the press! lol.

shadowspring said...

an't wait for the Mommy Dearest--Quiverfull Editions to start coming off the press! lol.

Lolz. I wonder if that's not A&Es real purpose behind continuing to promote the Duggars- they are holding their breath for the sequel, "Duggar Gone Wild". =D

Hopewell said...

I wonder that too sometimes!

truly catholic said...

Shame on you and for your ignorance. There is a middle ground here. My husband and I have 8 children and all them are spaced out because of Natural Family Planning NOT the rhythm method! The Catholic Church has never taught irresponsible parenting. Just because Catholics did not understand the teaching of birth control does NOT mean the Church teaches their misunderstanding! If you are going to speak for the Church, you have a responsibility to learn exactly what it teaches. By the way, this is coming from a woman NOT an authoritarian man!!!